Monthly- Archives: March 2019



JONATHAN LIM

Mr Watt´s Literary Services
The standard for winning awards in this unit was that you had to complete your Bellairs Slideshow (20-25 slides) and publish your movie review during class time, as final editing is done live. Congratulations and congratulations again, Jonathan, for winning this hard-fought battle! As a disclaimer for the order of publishing, I will be publishing Michael Dong’s Copper award after Gold. But Jonbo is King for this unit!

John Bellairs and Edward Gorey: a Winning Combination

The cover of the gripping The Ghost in the Mirror by John Bellairs features a massive rock, strewn with snow, so high that Rose Rita could be taken for a cold-looking doll at the bottom. The illustration, by the famous and taste-making Edward Gorey (1925-2000) transports the viewer into the atmosphere of the book, even before the first page is read. This is the second novel featuring Mrs. Zimmermann and Rose Rita, who appear as secondary characters in most of the other Lewis Barnavelt series, and like The Letter, the Witch and the Ring, the book, too, is set outside of New Zebedee, Michigan. The huge rock looming above Rose Rita added value to John Bellairs’s creative writing, and once you read the book you may understand why Gorey chose to feature this rock on the cover. Rose Rita and Mrs. Zimmermann are overwhelmed by the rawness of the 19th century in the book; the lack of electricity and the rawboned nature of pre-modern amenities have an effect on them.

The House with a Clock in its Walls, however, is the first book in Bellairs’s long career as a juvenile writer, and he and Gorey collaborated from the beginning. The house is almost a character in the book, as you would guess from the title.

When one thinks of John Bellairs they also think of Edward Gorey and vice versa. This dynamic duo collaborated over twenty novels. Edward Gorey’s black and white, scary illustrations are perfect for John Bellairs horrors. The interesting thing about their collaboration is that they didn’t talk a lot. “It doesn’t mean there couldn’t be two or three letters in miscellaneous correspondence. But as far as we are aware, they never communicated.” – Andreas Brown, who represents the Estate, says. They barely ever communicated when not working, and that only through a third party. The team use each other as a boost; Gorey’s illustrations very often heighten senses from the novel and give off a feeling of hopelessness and horror.

The House with a Clock in its Walls is an awesome novel: powerful magic, evil warlocks, bringing back the dead, the gain and loss of friends… and poor Lewis Barnavelt is stuck right in the middle of it. Lewis, freshly an orphan, ends up moving to his uncle’s new (old) house, bought with an inheritance. He then meets an elderly woman called Mrs. Zimmerman, who lives next door. As the book unravels, Lewis learns that the two people he is living (near and with), are magicians. While all of this is going on at home, he is struggling to fit in at school. Lewis is socially awkward, and also is a little bit on the chubbier side. He is constantly getting bullied, so when he gets a friend, he is desperate to not lose him. He goes so far to keep his friend that he is somehow subconsciously convinced to deal in black magic: necromancy. Unfortunately, the person he raises from the dead is none other than an evil witch who wants to destroy the world. Selenna Izard almost succeeds but is thwarted by Lewis, Jonathan and Mrs. Zimmerman. Bellairs has a way of making you want to read more, enchanting you to flip the page and dive in.

The thing I like about Edward Gorey is that he always works in black and white, which makes the scene feel a whole lot worse. Gorey also likes to draw simple faces, just two dots, a curvy nose and a mouth, but then on the same exact picture he puts an incredible amount of detail on one single brick, or a gravestone. Edward’s drawings also look so still, like they are not in motion. The thing about John Bellairs though is that I feel like he had a depressing life. Notice that John Bee’s characters are never happy. Jonathan is always depressed and Lewis is always worried, Rose Rita is pretending to be brave and Johnny Dixon is always scared. None of them produce true genuine smiles, I mean sometimes they do but they never truly last, because everyone is relieved only at the very end of the novel, when they finally triumphantly smile. That’s why I feel like Eddy and Johnny were made to be together, both so dark that they truly amaze readers.

In his debut novel, the house seems alive: with the creaky floorboards and the changing stained glass, the house has its own personality. Another feature to the house is the third floor. Imagine walking down a dark dusty hallway leading to a barren room; the third floor has a feeling that sends a chill up your spine. The house also seems to have an effect on Uncle Jonathan, when he walks around the hallways listening to the clock, acting all paranoid.

Lewis is socially awkward and a little weird looking, with short arms and short legs.

At the moment he is looking to the side which shows the viewer his sharp nose. Lewis is now sitting next to a window looking outside. The beautiful long curtains with small flowers on them are quite formal while Lewis’s bathrobe seems to be made with the same design. Once again we see Lewis’s sharp funny-looking nose.

Now, this book is so amazing they decided to make a movie about it. So in 2018, an American fantasy film appeared in theaters, called, The House With a Clock In its Walls. Directed by Eli Roth, based on the 1973 book by John Bellairs, it starred Jack Black as Uncle Jonathan, Owen Vaccaro as Lewis, Cate Blanchett as Mrs. Zimmermann, and Kyle MacLachlan as Mr. Izard. Released by Universal Pictures in the U.S. on September 21, 2018, and receiving $131.5 million in box office, against a production budget of $42 million, it was a financial success. Mr. Roth makes a cameo as Comrade Ivan.

The House with a Clock in its Walls movie was not very accurate. It did have the same plot but many things were different. John Bellairs’s amazing descriptions did not get into the movie, in my opinion. Two things really important to trhe production design in the house, were the chair and the windows, which Bellairs did not describe. Edward Gorey’s awesome illustrations also did not seem to get into the movie.

Another thing I did not like was that Tarby did not seem as important in the movie than the book. When Tarby quit being Lewis’s friend, the viewers don’t feel as sympathetic.  Also, it seemed that Mrs. Izard was alive the entire time, and, in the book, Lewis raised Mrs. Izard from the grave. Some smaller things that I didn’t like was that Lewis was not fat, meaning that the bullies did not tease him, making us not sympathize more with the main character; instead it was the goggles that he got teased for. Jack Black was a perfect actor for Jonathan, a balanced sense of humor, and he was awesome. I may have missed it from the book, but I didn’t know that Mrs. Zimmerman lost a family; I also feel like she did not play that big of role in all the action. Mrs. Zimmerman was of middle age, played by Cate Blanchett. She should have been played by an old actress, like Judy Dench. The names, characters, and Fifties atmosphere were all arrived at with fair accuracy, but the core of the book was replaced by something more easy for Hollywood. For instance, there was the book of Necromancy, under lock and key. But were there other books that Lewis read, like John L. Stoddard? There was also no car chase.

All in all, I was not very satisfied about this movie. It did however, make me think more about Edward Gorey’s impact on the book. I would rate this movie 6 out of 10 (or 3 stars), and would only recommend this movie to people who have not read the book yet, and if you read the book, don’t waste time on the movie. I felt like Jack Black was the best actor, because he was really funny, and I felt he did his homework.



TIFFANY CHAO

The Clocks of The House with a Clock in its Walls

Congratulations to Tiffany for snagging the Silver!

Clocks are seemingly mundane objects, and always seem to seamlessly blend into the background of every setting. But what happens when we start paying attention? The endless variations of brands, structures, and histories of clocks can be very telling. In The House With a Clock in its Walls, John Bellairs starts the book off with a distinct description of a gold pocket watch with a paper clip chain dangling out of Uncle Jonathan’s pocket. This seemingly trivial detail is actually a significant clue to Uncle Jonathan’s quaint character. His personality is an important catalyst for many events that will take place, and therefore characterizing him in this way so early on in the book is very important. He is a combination of refined and yet sloppy, with amazing taste and also a haphazard mysteriousness. He has a radical unpredictability, which is later also reflected in his home. Located atop a bell tower and glowing bright over the Main Street of New Zebedee, the next clock puts Uncle Jonathan in a trance.

Edward Gorey

“The arches of the belfry made a howling mouth and two gaping eyes; below the mouth was a large, glowing clock face with iron numerals.” This clock, presiding over the town square with a mysterious grandeur, brings with it a reaction from Uncle Jonathan that launches the beginning of a series of curious events. Following this clock comes the first clock Lewis sees upon entering the mansion, which “cleared its throat with a whirr and started to chime midnight”. This is the first of a series of clock sounds rooting Lewis’s realization of Uncle Jonathan’s obsession with clocks. Both are also portrayed in a way that makes them seem less like objects and more like houses themselves. This adds to their value and importance within the book.

Two mantle clocks and a grandfather clock later, and after a description of a cherrywood clock with columns of mercury as weights, Bellairs moves on to describe another one of Lewis’s personal clocks, “a new Westclox bedside clock.” Lewis watched as its “luminous hands […] crept toward midnight”. This is a subtle contribution to his sheltered and timid personality. This is Bellairs’s indirect way of showing the readers just who Lewis Barnavelt is, and this is somehow caught when we learn that his little clock is brand new. He has recently lost both of his parents in a car accident, has moved to Michigan from Wisconsin, and we can imagine the small comforts that he so needs. After a mundane description of “an electric clock” on the kitchen wall belonging to Mrs. Izard, in her temporary home, the audience is finally introduced to the infamous Clock in the Walls. The endless buildup and anticipation of this unveiling comes to an anticlimactic end as Bellairs finally reveals a “plain, old, Waterbury eight-day clock” hidden deep in the House’s cellars, behind a false coal chute door. Lewis heroically smashes it to pieces on the ground.

So, who was the genius who created this whimsical hero? John Bellairs was a college professor at Jesuit and Augustian colleges, matriculated at University of Chicago and the University of Notre Dame. It was as a professor that he further nurtured his skill and passion for writing, and where he developed endearing characters such as Lewis and Jonathan Barnavelt in The House With a Clock in Its Walls. Even though Bellairs was the author of this captivating novel, this book would not have been complete without a collection of wonderful drawings completed by none other than Edward Gorey. Known for his heavy-handed yet refined illustrations drawn in dark ink, Gorey rose to the top starting with an impressive education at Harvard University. He was a well-rounded artist, designing Broadway sets such as Dracula, illustrating for PBS’s Mystery, and working for art publisher Doubleday. Starting with this novel, Gorey and Bellairs both broke the bonds of what young adult horror traditionally was.

The vibrant illustrations of Gorey and the eloquent writing of Bellairs fit hand in hand, each cultivating the other in a multitude of ways. The mystery and horror aspects of the mansion and of the supernatural translate flawlessly into Gorey’s illustrations, emphasized with a dark sheen over the drawings that stems from his unique technique. Bellairs’s descriptions of the house’s gothic and Victorian decorum and structure are perfectly depicted by Gorey’s drawings, his art style fitting right in with the action images he portrays.

This September, the long-anticipated film adaptation to John Bellairs’s classic novel, The House With a Clock in its Walls was released by Amblin Entertainment. The story follows a young and virtuous boy called Lewis Barnavelt in his journey in exploring magic with his Uncle, Jonathan. There were many lovers of the book who couldn’t wait to see their favorite characters depicted on screen, establishing tremendous buildup and excitement about what is known as Bellairsia. However, many defining elements of the book were found missing in the movie, including not only the house itself, but many of the endearing characters that the fanbase had grown to love.

In the movie, the house is a large, multi-story mansion with high ceilings and stained-glass windows. Although it was large, the movie-set house seemed cramped. The house was full not in the sense that it was decorated, but that it was cluttered with an endless supply of Uncle Jonathan’s furniture and belongings. The wallpaper and furnishings appear old fashioned, appropriate for the supposed time period. The house as well as its clutter were generally unsystematic, almost as if the production designer’s budget was too large. Overall, other than its tremendous clutter, size, and the rooms (unmentioned in the book) containing masses of mannequins, freak show paraphernalia and doodads, the house was depicted fairly in structure, architecture, and layout.

Seeing this display of detailed clutter makes me wonder how much time its production designer, Jon Hutman, spent reading the book. It seems to me that he picked up only on the surface disarray of the house, missing the methodical significance of each item, carefully devised by Bellairs. Did Hutman recognize the value of the house as created by Bellairs, and every component of it? Did Hutman use the book to discover what he was capable of reproducing, or did he follow his own ideas? Did he draw any inspiration from the beautiful gothic and Victorian influences in the house within Bellairs’s descriptions and Gorey’s illustrations? Hutman’s haphazard design of the house missed the mark: the house in the film is hardly accurate.

The house itself is not the only unrecognizable component of the movie. Our beloved Lewis Barnavelt, sweet and vulnerable, was replaced in the movie by an arrogant, showy knockoff. This transformation can be attributed to one thing: casting. The actor, Owen Vaccaro, was simply miscast. Not overweight in the least, and having a bland emotional palette, the actor seemed like Harry Potter’s American cousin. One of the biggest changes made in the movie was that Lewis is able to perform magic, even pranking his nemesis at school, causing the water fountain to splash him. This type of school-for-wizard’s trope is nonexistent in the book. This gave Lewis a shallow character that makes him seem less of the worried, belittled character that so defined him in the book. This unnecessary change is overcompensated with an overly-exaggerated nerdy persona also accentuated in the movie, which made him seem still more arrogantly intelligent than timid and run down. The movie also fails to build up to Lewis’s big hero moment in the end, by giving him more power throughout the rising action. Giving Lewis this power, getting back at bullies and completing menial tasks (he snaps his fingers in the morning and his bed makes itself?), makes it far less impressive to the viewer when he finally becomes the world’s savior in the end. Giving Lewis the power of magic ended up not only taking away the wonderful aspects of Lewis Barnavelt, but also the individual aspects of Bellairs’s storyline, smothering it in an overused, unoriginal way. To say that the movie was inaccurate in its portrayal of Lewis Barnavelt would be an understatement.

One of the major things setting John Bellairs’s books apart from any other are his distinct illustrations by illustrator Edward Gorey. In fact, Gorey is almost considered an essential part to Bellairs’s impact as a writer, and while one might have hoped to see some influences of these drawings in the movie, they were vividly absent. This, again, turned Bellairs’s interesting, one-of-a-kind story into just another mass-produced, unoriginal movie with no individuality.