Monthly- Archives: October 2025



TIMPER XU

Going Solo by Roald Dahl: the responsibility of a citizen

Roald Dahl on wheel of a Hawker Hurricane

In the chapter “The Beginning of the War” from Roald Dahl’s memoir Going Solo, the war between Germany and England erupted. It was just a few months prior to this that Dahl came to Dar es Salaam, which is a city in present day Tanzania. Tanzania is hybrid word made up from the names of the two previous locations: Tanganyika and Zanzibar.

Dahl was ordered to capture Germans and was assigned to lead “twenty five highly trained troops with rifles” and also given a “machine gun”. He was shocked by this order; he could never imagine that he could suddenly become a soldier, much less an officer who can command soldiers to kill. To Dahl, it was done “by some magical process”, as only a moment ago he had been an employee of the Shell Oil Company. This type of violence was rarely seen or unknown in Dar es Salaam. The only use of a gun seen in the past chapters was only for scaring the “simba” or lion away.

Dahl was a subject of the British Empire, but he wasn’t a soldier; he came for his job and a few years of adventure in this beautiful place. In the few months that Dahl had been in Dar es Salaam he did nothing so violent like killing a person: he learned Swahili to communicate with his “own boy or with any other native of the country”, he helped to save “the cook’s wife” from the “huge lion” or “Simba”… he came to do the Shell Oil Company’s job. Dahl was a citizen who privately helped the British Empire control Dar es Salaam, but again, he wasn’t a soldier; he didn’t have the ability and responsibility to face and use violence.

Dar es Salaam harbor, ca. 1930s

Dahl’s first assignment was to block the one road out of town. He settled “the machine gun and rifles”, aiming down the road at the approach of German civilians. Dahl instructed his African troops to hide in the bushes next to the road and ordered the soldiers to fire a “burst over the heads of these people”, but “not at them” when he “raise two arms above [his] head”. For a brand new officer, untrained in military strategy, this was a brilliant move.

A convoy of Germans soon appeared on the horizon and came barreling towards Dahl, “stretching for a half a mile down the road”. These cars and trucks were laden with the possessions of these Germans, who were trying to get out of British control as fast as they could. Entire families were fleeing. “There were trucks piled high with baggage. There were ordinary saloons with pieces of furniture strapped on their roofs. There were vans and there were station wagons.”

The lead car, containing two men “beside [the driver] himself in the front seat” stopped and got out. One of these men was about to die, but he did not know it. The man about to die, a bald man, was “angry and his movements were full of menace”. He signaled to the line of cars pulling up, and the drivers stopped their cars and approached Dahl.

“I didn’t at all like the way things were shaping up”, Dahl writes. Do you want to know what happened next? Read the book.

It is not a citizen’s job to fight; it is a soldier’s responsibility to fight and defend. Dahl marched himself from a safe citizen to soldier in danger, and the most important point is that he wasn’t forced. It requires bravery to do such a thing. Holocausts, massacres, and violence flooded the world; no civilians can pull themselves out of this. About 50-85 million people were killed, and if Dahl wasn’t clever enough, he, as a civilian, may have already died in the hands of one of those German civilians.

But I can tell you that the Germans were sent to a prison camp, a place that mainly imprisons captured soldiers. These camps are frequently seen in World War Two, and not only Britain built them; the Germans, the Japanese, even the United States and most countries all over the world built prison camps for the soldiers of the enemy. Civilians were also imprisoned.

An internment camp on the Isle of Man in 1941

To me, there seems to be no reason to capture civilians. But, in a war like World War Two, did the Axis Powers treat foreign nationals as civilians? No. Germany kicked out ambassadors and illegally held Americans, for instance, in prison, without permission. The Allies too, fought dirty sometimes. The British rounded up Germans, Austrians and Italians, calling them ‘enemy aliens’ and men between the ages of 16-70 were sent to the Isle of Man. From what I’ve learned about this great conflict, the Japanese overtook parts of China, mercilessly slaughtering civilians; Germany was obviously rounding up civilian Jews and others they deemed subhuman, and even the USA rounded up civilian Japanese and put them into internment camps.

Japanese internment camp, Arizona, USA during WWII

Who knows: will the ones you let go today kill you or your fellow citizens tomorrow? This is war; to Dahl, and every person that wills to survive, letting go a person who is saying “vi are civilians”, back to their “Fatherland” is no different than giving soldiers back to the enemy.

Obviously the war between Allies and Axis powers was not only around Dar es Salaam; the danger in war was not only capturing a few Germans: this was just the beginning.

Dahl said to the giraffes, “’Hello, giraffes! Hello! Hello! Hello! How are you today?'” The giraffes are more interesting than war, but Dahl didn’t stop.

In the chapter “Flying Training”, Dahl writes about how he “join[ed] up [to] help in the fight against Bwana Hitler”; he had to first “set off [alone] on the 600-mile journey from Dar es Salaam to Nairobi to enlist in the RAF”. In this Dahl looked around at the natural animals of Africa; he realized that this may be his last laid-back and safe moment. This is the car he drove:

Ford Prefect, 1930s
a de Havilland Tiger Moth

 In the period of time Dahl is training, Dahl trained on “Tiger Moths” and “Hawker Harts”. Then at last he was ordered to go to war: he was sent to fight the Italians.

Hawker Hart

Generally the chapter reveals that Dahl, in “join[ing] up, sheds his last vestiges of childlike ways.”

At this point (1941) of WWII the Axis Powers were frequently expanding their territories. The Germans had just joined the Italians in Greece… mere days before Dahl arrives from Africa, his 6’6″ frame cramped into the cockpit for the solo flight over the Mediterranean.

Hawker Hurricane

In the chapter “First Encounter with a Bandit”. Dahl arrives in Greece to fight the Axis Powers. But what he learns upon arrival from his corporal is that he’s joined a base with only “Four Blenheims and fifteen ‘urricanes”; they had to fight “five ‘undred Kraut fighters and five ‘undred Kraut bombers”. They are “absolutely hopeless”.

Blenheims

 Dahl is concerned; how will he succeed in this enlistment? He has been nearly blinded and killed because of wrong information given by “the CO at Fouka”, and now he has been sent to this deadly war zone in a cramped cockpit. Imagine being Dahl, would you think you could survive in this harsh condition?

Dahl meets a person named “David Coke” who is also a pilot that “share[ed] a tent” with him. David “came from a very noble family” and if he wasn’t killed later, “he would have been none other than the Earl of Leicester owning one of the most enormous and beautiful stately homes in England”. David informs him: “the bombers you will meet will be mostly Ju 88s”. This later saves Dahl’s life.

A Nazi JU-88 bomber

The morning after arriving, Dahl is sent out on his first mission.

The first order Dahl had heard in his earphones was “‘Bandits over shipping at Khalkis. Vector 035 forty miles angels eight'”.

“‘Received,’ [Dahl] said. ‘I’m on my way'”.

“The translation of this simple message, which even I could understand, told me that if I set a course on my compass of thirty-five degrees and flew for a distance of forty miles, I would then, with a bit of luck, intercept the enemy at 8,000 feet, where he was trying to sink ships off a place called Khalkis, wherever that might be.”

Dahl has soon encountered his first hostile; “they were Ju 88s” and there were “six of them”. According to Dahl, “there are three men in a Ju 88”, “so six Ju 88s have no less than eighteen pairs of eyes”. This means that Dahl has to pay 100% of his attention, or else he would be immediately shot down.

As a reaction to the encounter of the bandits (not bandits, but actual Luftwaffe Nazi airmen), Dahl has quickly “turned the brass ring of [his] firing button from ‘safe’ to ‘fire’”; he is preparing for a bloody fight. 

When Dahl was just “about 200 yards” behind the bandits, they “began shooting at me [Dahl]”. He realized that he had got himself into “the worst possible position for an attacking fighter to be in”. Dahl has to fight six “Ju 88s” that have already spotted him. How can Dahl succeed in fighting back? Or how can he survive?

The change has come: “the passage between the mountains on either side narrowed and the Ju 88s were forced to go into line astern”. Then, BOOM! Dahl shot the closest plane to him in line: the engine poured out “black smoke”, the aircraft “began to lose height”, the pilots and airmen “jumped out”, and “the five remaining Ju 88s had disappeared”. 

This interruption may not have much impact on Dahl’s mission of rescuing Greece, but it has surely given Dahl a warning of what he will face later in war.

I admire his bravery like how I admire his literature; not everyone can be so brave like how not everyone can be so skilled in story writing. His act of participating in the war, stopping the Axis Powers rises him from only a talented writer to a hero; a hero that protects both his country and the world and millions of kids’ childhoods (with stories).



ISAAC ZHANG

Jean Craighead George (1919-2012)

Prompt: Read from 74-85 and write about Bando entering Sam’s life. Quote dialogue, and track their meeting from their becoming comfortable with each other, to Bando’s expressing admiration for Sam, to their working together and enjoying the fruits of their labor together. Use quotes, and discuss the human connection in contrast to the many months Sam has ahead of him alone. 250-300 words

Sam and Bando become friends with each other when Bando randomly appears at Sam’s campfire, and as they slowly get to know each other, they share their past and deepen their bond. Sam originally believes that Bando is a bandit, but still shows kindness, “teaching him to live off the land”, (78). Sam is willing to take in an outlaw and help him escape because he wants Bando as a friend, a human that he can connect and live with. While Sam is sheltering Bando, Bando expresses his amazement at Sam’s skills, expressing shock at his abilities to make fire and live in the wild. He is confused by a teenager living all on his own in the forest, with no guardians. And as Bando teaches Sam some of his skills, the two childishly talk about books and relax, watching Frightful fly around. Sam greatly values these little interactions where he has someone to talk to. He forgets his past where his only companion was Frightful, who he couldn’t really talk to, having to communicate without words. He relishes in human interaction and when Bando leaves, he is devastated, even over someone he knew for such a short time, showing his deep care and kindness, and the bond they created over such a short time. “I was so lonely that I kept sewing on my moccasins to keep myself busy” (Pg. 84).  Over the few months that Sam is alone he has to make friends with either rodents or birds, not having anyone to really connect with. 



TAYLEN LI

Charlie Kirk

1993-2025

Charlie Kirk was a pioneer of modern American conservative politics. He played a major role in securing Trump’s victory back in 2024, and his influence on Gen Z has been undeniable – completely reshaping how my generation engages with politics. The assassination of Charlie Kirk is a personal tragedy, but also a national tragedy. Whether you agreed with his views or not, this moment in history calls for reflection on how we can honor his legacy. We should not retreat in the fear and chaos of political violence, and we should not lose the confidence that Kirk has instilled, but instead continue his work in our own lives.  

Kirk’s courage was unwavering. He openly voiced his conservative opinions in environments that were often hostile to such stances, like college campuses. That boldness is a quality we all should take in. Kirk inspired young conservatives to articulate and defend their views in respectful debate, and his message to my generation was small, but powerful: young people determine the future of American politics and Western civilization. Between 2020 and 2024, Kirk raised support from over 47% of voters aged 18-29. He showed us that we could contribute to a cause and drive change. 

Considering how the man was constantly engulfed in controversy, and didn’t seem to crumble under all the fear and pressure, you might ask: why was Kirk so unapologetically critical and outspoken in addressing liberal ideology? To answer that question, we should look at Kirk’s takedown of Critical Race Theory. This discipline’s etiology can be traced back to the foundational framework of Derrick Bell, who characterized American society as inherently racist and divided between the oppressor whites and the victim blacks. Racism, according to Bell’s Critical Race Theory, is everywhere and cannot be removed from society. There are several pillars of this concept, including intersectionality (the practice of identifying one’s disadvantage and thereby positioning oneself as a victim) and the inevitability of racism. Kirk saw such a way of thinking as “a mind virus”, a poison to the minds of Americans. To him, the solution is common sense. Racism can be stopped, not through equity and redistribution (which will only amplify these thoughts), but through ceasing discussions of race. We all have possibly seen Morgan Freeman’s reaction to Mike Wallace: “I’m going to ask you to stop calling me a black man. I know you as Mike Wallace. You know me as Morgan Freeman”. Charlie said enough already! Shake off this stupid obsession and quit being victims.

What inspired me the most from his story was how he came from nearly nothing. Kirk embodied the American dream. At just 18 years old, Kirk, who had “no money, no connections and no idea what [he] was doing”, founded the conservative organization Turning Point USA from an Illinois garage. I admire his entrepreneurial spirit, willingness to take risks, and courage to fight for something that he genuinely cared about. A lot of young people don’t have the guts to do something of that caliber. Kirk worked hard to get to where he was, and that required grit and passion.

Kirk was a husband, father, believer, activist, patriot, visionary, and an American – just like all of us. We can honor Charlie Kirk through carrying forth his example – to be bold, unafraid, and to remember that the future of our country relies on young people to stand up and continue fighting for what we believe in.